Community forums
AW' = WH
We need a clear proof that he has a wallhack.
I think he has a wallhack but
I 'm not sure , there are many indications it that he have wh...
I think he has a wallhack but
I 'm not sure , there are many indications it that he have wh...
Hey Farrokh! How're you doing man? 
Anyway, what black says is the bloody truth. You can be as much convinced as you want that someone uses wallhack, but as a server admin you have the responsibility to make the right decision.
Without a working anticheat (I assume admins already checked for the "kemk" GUID or for the 1337 port) you cant just ban someone basing on players complaints or on the sensation you get.
You need an incontrovertible proof the guy uses a cheat. In cases like this it's never easy!
Just keep recording demos and I assure you everything will be done to find this proof, if it exists.
Anyway, what black says is the bloody truth. You can be as much convinced as you want that someone uses wallhack, but as a server admin you have the responsibility to make the right decision.
Without a working anticheat (I assume admins already checked for the "kemk" GUID or for the 1337 port) you cant just ban someone basing on players complaints or on the sensation you get.
You need an incontrovertible proof the guy uses a cheat. In cases like this it's never easy!
Just keep recording demos and I assure you everything will be done to find this proof, if it exists.
715&716 : well, he knew they were there, one could clearly hear the medic, and he preaimed the corner where one would expect the enemies while going around. Would have done that myself.
VERY Suspicious: 715, 716, 719, 725, 729.
715, 716-Seems to trace them behind the wall
719-Throws the nade to the exact spot
725-Ignores 2 guys and traces the guy behind the wall
.
719: hm. its a rather common nade though. if you know the map you can just throw it and basically have a 50% chance of a kill on this server.
the water -> water kills are really hard to tell. i basically had to watch the demo a 2nd time to see that one could actually see the enemy without normals turned on. Might be related to pink tac color on my side though
. white player models surely help with such. (this is a major problem i've had with player side skin selection)points worth noting:
when he dies to the HK at red score 705: he didnt preaim the corner, where one could even hear an enemy.
On the the really interesting one:
Right after respawn(and switching to the m4) he gets that kill on someone in the water, without seeing him.
I literally had to watch the demo 4 times to get a hold of what was happening there, and it may actually be "hacky."
so he leaves the castle, wants to rush over the bridge, and sees a tac marker in the water for like half a second or less (cant really tell, watched it at timescale .25 and fov 90)
he then gets to stop behind a truck, goes forward to the water, aims at where he expects the enemy, fires 2 times and misses.
then he readjusts and gets 3 hits resulting in a kill.
1) he readjusted after not hitting.
2) he readjusted in a direction i wouldnt have had, based on the enemies facing and statistics of where people would swim to.
3) it was a pretty long time between the spot and the (no vision) kill.
4) he actually moved while shooting the enemy and still was able to remain on target.
Conclusion:
Does he hack? Cant tell. (still)
Do i think he hacks? dont know. 1st assumption is no, based on the majority of his kills simply being him being smater than his opponents
2nd though is that he actually aims at stupid spots a lot of the time. (no not tracking) and his movements arent that top notch, though well above average.
Now if he would hack, he would probably less like he does, and if he doesnt (aka pro) he would preaim better.
Oh well.
